Let's take a closer look and see if there really was reason for hope for the sport's proletariat.
As always, the table comes first, and as always, it will include everyone in both the Melog top 75 and the ATP's:
Rank
|
Player
|
Melog
|
ATP Rank
|
ATP Pts
|
1
|
Novak Djokovic
|
86.5
|
1
|
12920
|
2
|
Roger Federer
|
62.4
|
2
|
10265
|
3
|
David Ferrer
|
53.1
|
5
|
6505
|
4
|
Andy Murray
|
52.7
|
3
|
8000
|
5
|
Rafael Nadal
|
50.7
|
4
|
6690
|
6
|
Tomas Berdych
|
45.7
|
6
|
4680
|
7
|
Juan Martin Del Potro
|
42.7
|
7
|
4480
|
8
|
Jo Wilfried Tsonga
|
29.4
|
8
|
3490
|
9
|
Nicolas Almagro
|
22.5
|
11
|
2515
|
10
|
Richard Gasquet
|
20.4
|
10
|
2515
|
11
|
Milos Raonic
|
19.3
|
13
|
2380
|
12
|
Janko Tipsarevic
|
17.9
|
9
|
2990
|
13
|
Stanislas Wawrinka
|
15.3
|
17
|
1900
|
14
|
Tommy Haas
|
15.2
|
21
|
1695
|
15
|
Juan Monaco
|
14.5
|
12
|
2430
|
16
|
Marin Cilic
|
13.4
|
15
|
2210
|
17
|
John Isner
|
12.5
|
14
|
2215
|
18
|
Philipp Kohlschreiber
|
12.1
|
20
|
1770
|
19
|
Kei Nishikori
|
11.8
|
19
|
1830
|
20
|
Sam Querrey
|
11.5
|
22
|
1650
|
21
|
Gilles Simon
|
10.5
|
16
|
2165
|
22
|
Mikhail Youzhny
|
9.5
|
25
|
1335
|
23
|
Andreas Seppi
|
9.2
|
23
|
1560
|
24
|
Mardy Fish
|
8.7
|
27
|
1255
|
25
|
Radek Stepanek
|
8.7
|
31
|
1135
|
26
|
Alexandr Dolgopolov
|
8.6
|
18
|
1855
|
27
|
Marcos Baghdatis
|
8.5
|
36
|
1070
|
28
|
David Nalbandian
|
8.2
|
82
|
635
|
29
|
Fernando Verdasco
|
7.3
|
24
|
1490
|
30
|
Kevin Anderson
|
6.9
|
37
|
1065
|
31
|
Martin Klizan
|
6.9
|
30
|
1175
|
32
|
Thomaz Bellucci
|
6.7
|
33
|
1112
|
33
|
Julien Benneteau
|
5.8
|
35
|
1075
|
34
|
Feliciano Lopez
|
5.0
|
40
|
1005
|
35
|
Andy Roddick
|
4.9
|
39
|
1015
|
36
|
Gael Monfils
|
4.9
|
77
|
660
|
37
|
Grigor Dimitrov
|
4.8
|
48
|
866
|
38
|
Santiago Giraldo
|
4.8
|
57
|
778
|
39
|
Jarkko Nieminen
|
4.6
|
41
|
927
|
40
|
Denis Istomin
|
4.5
|
43
|
897
|
41
|
Florian Mayer
|
4.2
|
28
|
1215
|
42
|
Nikolay Davydenko
|
3.8
|
44
|
885
|
43
|
Jeremy Chardy
|
3.6
|
32
|
1131
|
44
|
Jerzy Janowicz
|
3.4
|
26
|
1299
|
45
|
Michael Llodra
|
3.2
|
53
|
823
|
46
|
Ivo Karlovic
|
3.1
|
100
|
556
|
47
|
David Goffin
|
3.0
|
46
|
868
|
48
|
Edouard Roger Vasselin
|
3.0
|
102
|
545
|
49
|
Benoit Paire
|
2.9
|
47
|
867
|
50
|
Lukas Rosol
|
2.8
|
73
|
679
|
51
|
Nicolas Mahut
|
2.8
|
108
|
515
|
52
|
Viktor Troicki
|
2.7
|
38
|
1055
|
53
|
Albert Ramos
|
2.6
|
50
|
830
|
54
|
Ryan Harrison
|
2.6
|
69
|
710
|
55
|
Igor Sijsling
|
2.6
|
68
|
712
|
56
|
Yen Hsun Lu
|
2.5
|
59
|
759
|
57
|
Steve Darcis
|
2.4
|
93
|
571
|
58
|
Carlos Berlocq
|
2.4
|
66
|
720
|
59
|
Paul Henri Mathieu
|
2.4
|
58
|
763
|
60
|
Bernard Tomic
|
2.4
|
52
|
825
|
61
|
Xavier Malisse
|
2.3
|
63
|
746
|
62
|
Tommy Robredo
|
2.2
|
114
|
495
|
63
|
Victor Hanescu
|
2.1
|
62
|
753
|
64
|
Lleyton Hewitt
|
2.1
|
83
|
625
|
65
|
Andrey Kuznetsov
|
2.1
|
78
|
660
|
66
|
Brian Baker
|
2.0
|
61
|
756
|
67
|
Roberto Bautista Agut
|
2.0
|
80
|
648
|
68
|
Marcel Granollers
|
1.9
|
34
|
1100
|
69
|
Benjamin Becker
|
1.9
|
65
|
741
|
70
|
Lukasz Kubot
|
1.9
|
74
|
675
|
71
|
Aljaz Bedene
|
1.8
|
86
|
583
|
72
|
Alejandro Falla
|
1.6
|
54
|
809
|
73
|
Horacio Zeballos
|
1.6
|
85
|
615
|
74
|
Go Soeda
|
1.6
|
60
|
758
|
75
|
Fabio Fognini
|
1.5
|
45
|
880
|
77
|
Leonardo Mayer
|
1.5
|
71
|
702
|
80
|
Gilles Muller
|
1.4
|
67
|
719
|
83
|
Robin Haase
|
1.2
|
56
|
780
|
90
|
Jurgen Melzer
|
1.0
|
29
|
1177
|
93
|
Bjorn Phau
|
1.0
|
75
|
668
|
96
|
Marinko Matosevic
|
0.9
|
49
|
845
|
100
|
Paolo Lorenzi
|
0.8
|
64
|
744
|
102
|
Ivan Dodig
|
0.8
|
72
|
695
|
103
|
Daniel Gimeno Traver
|
0.7
|
70
|
704
|
114
|
Lukas Lacko
|
0.5
|
51
|
827
|
119
|
Pablo Andujar
|
0.4
|
42
|
915
|
156
|
Grega Zemlja
|
-0.1
|
55
|
782
|
Well. The top of that table seems to present quite the glass ceiling to anyone outside the top 7. (Del Potro's rating of 42.7 would have placed him 3rd, 4th, and 4th in the years 2013-15; this year, it gets him #7.) If anything, the top tier looks bigger and stronger in 2012 than it had previously, because there were more upper-echelon guys banding together to oppress the masses.
Let's compare 2012's top 7 to two other sets of players. We'll use top 7 from 2013 (the same group of players in both years, in both the Melog and ATP ratings), as well as the top 7 from 2003, the last year before 2012 in which the Slams were split four ways. (Once again, the ATP and Melog systems agree on the top 7 that year - you can look up who they are if you want, but I'm not spoiling Melog's order among them).
Overall records of the top 7 players:
2012: 446-101 (.815 W%)
2013: 402-106 (.791)
2003: 451-133 (.772)
By the most basic measurement, 2012 seems to have the most dominant top group (if you're OK with the relatively arbitrary selection of 7 players, at least). But raw winning percentage isn't everything, especially because the top players in tennis generally spend quite a bit of time facing each other, which will always result in a loss for one of them. So what happens when we account for that?
Records of the top 7 against players outside the top 7:
2012: 383-38 (.910)
2013; 351-55 (.865)
2003: 419-101 (.806)
The difference gets even bigger - mostly because there were more matches between top-7 players in 2012 (63) than in either of the other years (51 in 2013, 32 in 2003).
Clearly, the fact that the Slams were split four ways in 2012 wasn't so much representative of a return to parity in tennis as it was a result of the kind of infighting you'll sometimes see while an oligarchy solidifies itself in power.
Before we finish up, here are the usual tables of players on whom Melog and the ATP disagreed in 2012.
Melog liked:
Player
|
Melog
|
ATP
|
2012 Age
|
2013 ATP
|
David Nalbandian
|
28
|
82
|
30
|
229
|
Ivo Karlovic
|
46
|
100
|
33
|
78
|
Gael Monfils
|
36
|
77
|
26
|
31
|
Edouard Roger Vasselin
|
48
|
102
|
29
|
52
|
Nicolas Mahut
|
51
|
108
|
30
|
50
|
Tommy Robredo
|
62
|
114
|
30
|
18
|
David Ferrer
|
3
|
5
|
30
|
3
|
Steve Darcis
|
57
|
93
|
28
|
164
|
Tommy Haas
|
14
|
21
|
34
|
12
|
Santiago Giraldo
|
38
|
57
|
25
|
69
|
Wait, Santiago Giraldo is on Melog's good list this time? He's been in the opposite group multiple times. Melog needs to make up its mind.
Anyway... this list looks pretty good. Nalbandian, Darcis, and Giraldo did not support Melog's good opinion of them going forward (Nalbandian's career was nearly over at this point), but Melog nailed Monfils, Roger Vasselin, Mahut, Ferrer, and Haas, and Robredo jumped hugely in both systems in 2013 as he completed his injury comeback. Karlovic is the only guy on the list who settled comfortably between the two ratings the next year.
ATP liked:
Player
|
Melog
|
ATP
|
2012 Age
|
2013 ATP
|
Jurgen Melzer
|
90
|
29
|
31
|
27
|
Grega Zemlja
|
156
|
55
|
26
|
121
|
Pablo Andujar
|
119
|
42
|
26
|
48
|
Lukas Lacko
|
114
|
51
|
25
|
81
|
Marcel Granollers
|
68
|
34
|
26
|
38
|
Marinko Matosevic
|
96
|
49
|
27
|
61
|
Jerzy Janowicz
|
44
|
26
|
22
|
21
|
Fabio Fognini
|
75
|
45
|
25
|
16
|
Paolo Lorenzi
|
100
|
64
|
31
|
109
|
That list is much worse. The only clear Melog win out of the nine players is Lorenzi; you can argue for Zemlja and Lacko, but both are pretty firmly established in between their ratings in the two systems. And Melzer, Andujar, Granollers, and Janowicz all maintained their positions in the ATP ratings, while Fognini climbed even higher. (There are some caveats there - for instance, Janowicz's 2012 and 2013 ATP rankings are both based on one big run at an important tournament, and he's slipped considerably after failing to duplicate that success in the following two years. But it's still not a great-looking list.)
Next time we take a step back, it'll be to 2011. We will eventually reach a year in which Melog does not have Novak Djokovic at #1, but given that Novak's 2011 is one of the great seasons in tennis history, it probably won't be that year.
No comments:
Post a Comment